Peer Review Policy

The Splendid journals are peer reviewed by two or three reviewers and the final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief.

1.The manuscript is verified with respect to the scope of the journal. If the manuscript is out of the journal scope, it is rejected (desk reject) by the Editor-in-Chief without performing the complete review process.

2. An administrative check is performed on the submitted material. Plagiarism content and Completeness is verified. All questions in the submission form must be answered and, eventually, properly documented. The manuscript must be readable and written in English. If any of the above aspects is not satisfying the requirements, the manuscript is returned to authors for proper correction. Then, the complete review process is started.

3. A manuscript submitted to regular issues is assigned by the Editor-in-Chief.

4. The reviewers return their evaluation, recommendations, and suggestions for improving the manuscript.

5. The Editor-in-Chief  makes a recommendation for acceptance, revision, or rejection to the Editor-in-Chief, on the basis of the received reviews and his/her personal assessment of the manuscript.

7. The Editor-in-Chief takes the final decision about acceptance, revision, or rejection on the basis of the assessment and the reviewer reports. If the final decision for a manuscript is revise, the review process is repeated from step 2.

Breach of Code

Being an association dedicated for the researcher fraternity, we all should ensure that the code of ethics formed is followed in all possible ways. Being a not-for-profit body it is the internal responsibility of a person whom should have to follow the codes, there is no enforcement to follow. As the aim of the Journal is to get the original research work from the researchers and the scholars.

Suggestions:-  Any suggestions about the improvement of  The Splendid Journals is always  invited at editor@thesplendidjournals.com